The debate on climate change and health in the context of ecological public health: a necessary corrective to Costello et al.’s ‘biggest global health threat’, or co-opted apologists for the neoliberal hegemony?
- Abstract
The threat posed to global health by climate change has been widely discussed internationally. The United Kingdom public health community seem to have accepted this as fact and have called for urgent action on climate change, often through state interventionist mitigation strategies and the adoption of a risk discourse. Putting aside the climate change deniers’ arguments, there are critics of this position who seem to accept climate change as a fact but argue that the market and/or economic development should address the issue. Their view is that carbon reduction (mitigation) is a distraction, may be costly and is ineffective. They argue that what is required is more economic development and progress even if that means a warmer world. Both positions however accept the fact of growth based capitalism and thus fail to critique neoliberal market driven capitalism or posit an alternative political economy that eschews growth. Ecological public health, however, appears to be a way forward in addressing not only social determinants of health but also the political and ecological determinants. This might allow us to consider not just public health but also planetary health and health threats that arise from growth based capitalism.
- Resource Type
- Peer-reviewed article
- Author
- B. Goodman
- Publication
- Public Health
- Journal Abbr.
- Public Health
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1059-1065
- Date
- Dec 2014
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.08.017
- ISSN
- 1476-5616
- Short Title
- The debate on climate change and health in the context of ecological public health
- Organization Type
- Academic
- Solution
- Market mechanisms
- Other
- International policy Social determinants of health Policy International