US Climate and Health Alliance

Oakland rejects coal terminal, sets example on climate change

Abstract

Two weeks ago, the Oakland City Council unanimously voted to ban the handling and storage of coal in the city, quashing a proposal to build what could have been the largest coal export facility in California.It was a remarkable display of leadership and foresight: Council members put the health and safety of their residents above the arguments of coal proponents and developers eager to profit from its export.Council members saw through the argument that we must choose between good jobs and a healthy environment, an argument often used in poor, minority communities. “It is outrageous to me that when we start talking about jobs for African Americans, for low-wage workers, they’re the dirtiest jobs, the most risky jobs, the jobs that we have to pay for with our bodies and shortened lives,” said council President Lynette Gibson McElhaney.

Resource Type
Opinion/editorial
Author
The Sacramento Bee
Resource URL
http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-ed/soapbox/article88835157.html
Date
July 11, 2016
Organization Type
News
Health and Human Impact
Respiratory disease
Climate and Environmental Impact
Overview/general
Emission Sources
Conventional energy Energy Conventional
Fossil Fuel
Coal
Solution
Climate mitigation/GHG reduction
Region
Southwest
Other
Health surveillance

Resources main page