How well does climate change and human health research match the demands of policymakers? A scoping review
- Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2008, the World Health Organization (WHO) Member States passed a World Health Assembly resolution that identified the following five priority areas for research and pilot projects on climate change and human health: health vulnerability, health protection, health impacts of mitigation and adaptation policies, decision-support and other tools, and costs of health protection from climate change. OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent to which recently published research corresponds to these priorities, we undertook a scoping review of original research on climate change and human health. Scoping reviews address topics that are too broad for a systematic review and commonly aim to identify research gaps in existing literature. We also assessed recent publication trends for climate change and health research. METHODS: We searched for original quantitative research published from 2008 onward. We included disease burden studies that were specific to climate change and health and included intervention studies that focused on climate change and measured health outcomes. We used MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science databases and extracted data on research priority areas, geographic regions, health fields, and equity (systematic differences between advantaged and disadvantaged social groups). DISCUSSION: We identified 40 eligible studies. Compared with other health topics, the number of climate change publications has grown rapidly, with a larger proportion of reviews or editorials. Recent original research addressed four of the five priority areas identified by the WHO Member States, but we found no eligible studies of health adaptation interventions, and most of the studies focused on high-income countries. CONCLUSIONS: Climate change and health is a rapidly growing area of research, but quantitative studies remain rare. Among recently published studies, we found gaps in adaptation research and a deficit of studies in most developing regions. Funders and researchers should monitor and respond to research gaps to help ensure that the needs of policymakers are met.
- Resource Type
- Peer-reviewed article
- Authors
- Jamie Hosking Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum
- Resource URL
- http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22504669
- Publication
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Journal Abbr.
- Environ. Health Perspect.
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1076-1082
- Date
- Aug 2012
- DOI
- 10.1289/ehp.1104093
- ISSN
- 1552-9924
- Short Title
- How well does climate change and human health research match the demands of policymakers?
- Organization Type
- Academic
- Solution
- Public health/health sector response
- Other
- Climate science